THIS ISSUE

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7553

19 March 2013

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 4

PJSC Vseukrainskyi Aktsionernyi Bank v Maksimov and other companies [2013] EWHC 422 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 64 (Mar)

R (on the application of First Stop Wholesale Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] EWCA Civ 183, [2013] All ER (D) 105 (Mar)

Wheels Common Investment Fund Trustees Ltd and other companies v Revenue and Customs Commissioners C-424/11 [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Mar)

Christou and another v Haringey London Borough [2013] EWCA Civ 178, [2013] All ER (D) 104 (Mar)

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd C-607/11, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

Jennifer James fails to find justice at the check-out queue

New employment senior associate for Manchester office

New HQ in Cambridge

New appointments to Isle of Man office

New appointments at BIHR

Show

Results

Go to page of 4

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS

Read All

Conveyancers celebrate U-turn over mortgage handbook fee

Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook

Are you suited to a career in prosecution?

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors

LSB marks Mazur homework

Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)

NLJ this week: Stuck in the past?

The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness

NLJ this week: No automatic bar on ‘user damages’

A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law

Error message

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7553

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison