header-logo header-logo

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

PJSC Vseukrainskyi Aktsionernyi Bank v Maksimov and other companies [2013] EWHC 422 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 64 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Popplewell J, 7 Mar 2013

The High Court has given guidance on the jurisdiction in T.S.B Private Bank International SA v Chabra [1992] 2 All ER 245 (the Chabra jurisdiction) concerning freezing orders against the ultimate beneficial owner of the assets of a corporate defendant.

Mr D’Cruz (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant. Ms Healy (instructed by Ince & Co) for the corporate defendants.

The claimant bank was a public joint stock company incorporated under Ukrainian law. It obtained a freezing order against the second to the fourth defendants (the corporate defendants), which were companies registered under the laws of England and Wales. The bank brought arbitration proceedings in London against the first defendant, M. The proceedings concerned a framework agreement under which M was to sell a major stake in the bank to another major shareholder (TBIF). The sale was subject to conditions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll