header-logo header-logo

EU—Broadcasting

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd C-607/11, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The concept of “communication to the public”, within the meaning of Art 3(1) of Directive (EC) 2001/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), should be interpreted as meaning that it covered a retransmission of the works included in a terrestrial television broadcast—where the retransmission is made by an organisation other than the original broadcaster—by means of an internet stream made available to the subscribers of that other organisation who might receive that retransmission by logging on to its server—even though those subscribers were within the area of reception of that terrestrial television broadcast and might lawfully receive the broadcast on a television receiver. It was not irrelevant that a “communication” within the meaning of Art 3(1) of the Directive was of a profit-making nature. However, a profit-making nature was not necessarily an essential condition for the existence of a communication to the public. Consequently, a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll