header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7317

17 April 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

News In Brief

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (proceedings under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005) [2008] EWHC 689 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 114 (Apr)

R (on the application of Griffin) v Richmond Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 84 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 181 (Jan)

James v London Borough of Greenwich [2008] EWCA Civ 35, [2008] All ER (D) 54 (Feb)

Re S (a child) (expert evidence) [2008] All ER (D) 51 (Mar)

Dunlop Haywards Ltd v Erinaceous Insurance Services Ltd [2008] EWHC 520 (Comm), [2008] All ER (D) 11 (Apr)

R v R [2008] EWCA Crim 678, [2008] All ER (D) 61 (Apr)

Aribisala v St James’ Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd [2008] EWHC 456 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 201 (Mar)

R (on the application of Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] EWHC 714 (Admin)

R v Mitchell [2008] All ER (D) 109 (Apr)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll