header-logo header-logo

Family law

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Re S (a child) (expert evidence) [2008] All ER (D) 51 (Mar)

In instructing experts, nothing relevant should be excluded, but material that is unnecessary  because it is irrelevant must be rigorously excluded.
 

Experts have to be spared files of documents which are peripheral to their essential task. It is important that local authorities abstain from introducing into proceedings and sending to an expert  material that would be inevitably perceived by the person being assessed as unfair in the sense that it was  prejudicial.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll