header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7810

28 September 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

Steve Evans considers the impact of Millar v Millar when interpreting trust deeds

Bethan Walsh examines the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation ruling & its implications for charitable companies

Nicholas Dobson explains why the government was wrong to reduce Housing Possession Duty Schemes without proper consultation

Edward Peters & Philip Sissons round up a selection of recent property cases

From fragmentation to automatically unfair dismissal, John McMullen serves up some recent caselaw

Roger Smith questions why the triage process, vital for the success of the online court modernisation programme, has gone AWOL

UK could not be forced to revoke the Article 50 notice

Party conference speakers to highlight risks of Brexit, LiPS & legal aid cuts

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll