header-logo header-logo

26 September 2018
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for lawyers to get political

Party conference speakers to highlight risks of Brexit, LiPS & legal aid cuts

Barrister and solicitor representatives have hit the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat party conference circuit, with the Law Society highlighting Brexit, access to justice and use of legal technology, and the Bar Council calling for more spending on the justice system.

Chair Andrew Walker QC and chair-elect Richard Atkins QC will be speaking at events organised by JUSTICE, Liberty, the Society of Labour Lawyers and the Society of Conservative Lawyers. In a briefing note for MPs and party members, the Bar Council said justice was ‘rising up the public, media and political agenda as the consequences of austerity measures are beginning to sink in’.

The Bar Council said the removal of legal aid from large areas of civil law had left law centres unable to cope and forced to turn away deserving clients whose problems spiralled out of control and became more expensive to put right. Judges were concerned about the rise in litigants in person (LiPs), whose cases took on average 50% longer to determine and resulted in more appeals, eating into court time and resources, it said, and justice should be properly funded in the next government spending round.

The Law Society said the EU ‘has facilitated an effective single market for legal services’, allowing lawyers and law firms to set up in the EU. Unless alternative arrangements were agreed, post-Brexit UK lawyers would fall back on more than 30 different national regulatory systems, ‘facing restrictions and limits to their practise rights’. It called on the government to negotiate mutual access for lawyers, including rights of audience in EU courts and legal professional privilege at the EU Commission.

On access to justice, the society urged the reinstatement of legal aid for early advice in housing and family law, to prevent escalation of problems.

Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll