header-logo header-logo

Property law update

27 September 2018 / Edward Peters KC , Philip Sissons
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Edward Peters & Philip Sissons round up a selection of recent property cases

  • Modification of restrictive covenants.
  • Costs guidance in the First-tier Tribunal.
  • Residential property dispute deployment pilot.
  • Horizontal and vertical boundaries.

The Upper Tribunal has a discretionary jurisdiction to modify or discharge restrictive covenants under s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925). The question of whether the tribunal can and will exercise that jurisdiction in a variety of different factual circumstances is often of substantial financial and personal importance, and continues to produce a steady flow of decisions.

In the recent case of Re Geall [2018] UKUT 154 (LC), the Upper Tribunal decided to exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to s 84 to modify a restrictive covenant to permit the conversion of a barn into a new dwelling house.

The applicant was the owner of property comprising a bungalow and a barn which was used for agricultural storage. The land was subject to restrictive covenants which restricted use of the land to a single private dwelling house. The applicant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll