header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7752

30 June 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

R (on the application of DA and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Shelter intervening) [2017] EWHC 1446 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 129 (Jun)

Re Mason & Sons Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation); Richardson and another v White and another [2017] EWHC 1512 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 141 (Jun)

R (on the application of Rahman) v Local Government Election Court [2017] EWHC 1413 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 126 (Jun)

Thornhill v Bagas [2017] EWHC 1513 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 139 (Jun)

Sharp v Sharp [2017] EWCA Civ 408, [2017] All ER (D) 74 (Jun)

Halborg v EMW Law LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 793, [2017] All ER (D) 147 (Jun)

C21 London Estates Ltd v Maurice MacNeill Iona Ltd [2017] EWHC 998 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 142 (Jun)

Astex Therapeutics Ltd v Astrazeneca AB [2017] EWHC 1442 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 118 (Jun)

Lobo v Corich; Corich v Lobo [2017] EWHC 1438 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 132 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll