header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7729

13 January 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Reverend Canon Pemberton v Right Reverend Richard Inwood UKEAT/0072/16/BA, [2016] All ER (D) 80 (Dec)

Siddiqui v University of Oxford [2016] EWHC 3150 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 57 (Dec)

Roderick Ramage explains why life assurance & automatic enrolment might be bad for you

    Kateb v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1176, [2016] All ER (D) 42 (Dec)

     

    David Burrows discusses anonymity for children & others involved in family proceedings in his final article on contempt

    Art 127 to be focus of new Brexit High Court case

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Freeths—Ruth Clare

    Freeths—Ruth Clare

    National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

    Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

    Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

    Partner appointed head of family team

    mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

    mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

    Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

    NEWS
    Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
    The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
    Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
    The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
    A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
    back-to-top-scroll