header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Contempt & court proceedings (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
13 January 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7729_burrows

David Burrows discusses anonymity for children & others involved in family proceedings in his final article on contempt
  • ​When can the press or other members of the public attend court?
  • Open court: the general rule; but rarely in family proceedings.
  • “What’s in a name?” Transparency or anonymity for family proceedings?

In Appleton & Anor v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2015] EWHC 2689 (Fam), [2016] 2 FLR 1, [2015] All ER (D) 131 (Sep) Mr Justice Mostyn described the law about press attendance at family proceedings as “a mess”. If press attendance is a mess, so too is the law about attendance of anyone else; or for release of any documents from family proceedings; and as to when a hearing is in open court or not. In “Watchdog or wolf in sheep’s clothing?” Caroline East considered privacy in financial relief in Appleton and the earlier case of DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 114 (Sep) sub nom L v L (Ancillary Relief

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Read All
Tax shock ahead for partners?
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll