header-logo header-logo

12 January 2017
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash reforms: a special case for motorcyclists

Motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians should be exempt from the government’s proposed “whiplash” reforms, one of the UK’s largest personal injury firms has said.

Fletcher’s Solicitors, which handles about 30% of motorcycle accidents in England and Wales, said a blanket approach would risk denying justice to vulnerable groups. It said about 18,000 motorcyclists make up ten per cent of all casualties despite motorcyclists only accounting for 1% of all road use. 

The Ministry of Justice proposals aim to deter fraud by removing compensation for minor whiplash claims or replacing it with a fixed sum. The Ministry would also raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £5,000 in personal injury claims—costs cannot be recovered in the small claims court, even if successful.

Ed Fletcher, CEO of Fletchers Solicitors, said: “We estimate less than 0.0002% of motorcycle claims involve findings of dishonesty.

“The proposals also fail to take into account the complex nature of accidents involving vulnerable road users who aren’t protected by a car when an impact takes place. Not only are their injuries more complex and varied as a result, but also, in our experience, the question of who is to blame is twice as likely to be disputed in motorcycle cases compared to the average motor claim.”

Fletcher said any reforms should emphasise the distinction between “occupants of a vehicle” and vulnerable road users.

The consultation, Reforming the soft tissue injury (whiplash) claims process, closed last week. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said it would be “some weeks” before it publishes its response.

Issue: 7729 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll