THIS ISSUE
Dominic Regan celebrates a list of legal losers
Jon Robins tackles the Justice Gap
Liberate social policy from the influence of human rights, says Jon Holbrook
Ian Smith considers the latest employment law developments
Controversial SRA plans are shelved
Eight complex criminal trials may suffer fate of Operation Cotton
Judge criticises government’s “neither confirm nor deny” policy
One in 10 large retailers unaware of new scheme
IT system could be in place by end of next year
Children and Families Act 2014 commencement
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Hugh James—Phil Edwards
Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=e3c4b2f1_1)
Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe
Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire
DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr
Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London
NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
