header-logo header-logo

07 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employers ignorant about early conciliation

One in 10 large retailers unaware of new scheme

The early conciliation service—which became compulsory this week for anyone considering an employment tribunal claim—is unknown to one in 10 large retailers.

New research by law firm Bond Dickinson and the British Retail Consortium uncovered the gap in knowledge. Of those who knew about the new service, one third were cautiously optimistic and the rest felt it would have a neutral or negative effect on their business.

The early conciliation service, which launched on 6 April and became compulsory a month later, is a free service run by Acas. The aggrieved employee or employer notifies Acas of their complaint. An Acas officer then contacts the parties involved and investigates whether an attempt at agreement can be made. If either side declines or can’t be contacted, Acas issues a form stating that conciliation is not possible. Only then can the aggrieved party launch a claim.

The research also found that 10% of retailers were unaware they could, as of 6 April, face fines of up to £5,000 for losing employment tribunal cases on top of their liability for any compensation due.

Christina Tolvas-Vincent, partner at Bond Dickinson, says: “The service has received a cautious thumbs up from the industry, but it is concerning that some are still unaware of its existence and the new possibility of fines for losing employment tribunals.”

The number of employment claims brought has dropped by nearly 80% since fees of up to £250 were introduced last July. 

 

Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll