header-logo header-logo

Strike force

05 August 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Opinion , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail
istock_000013079680medium_4

Stephen Levinson ponders the legalities of restraining strikes

What is a legitimate strike? We have been arguing about this since Disraeli introduced the concept of trade union immunity in 1875.

The threat of an increasing number of strikes is obviously real. If “something must be done”, the difficult questions are where should the boundaries of legitimacy be drawn and how should they be enforced? So far, the answers put forward by politicians have been mechanistic rather than principled.

Politicians speak out

Business secretary Vince Cable threatens unspecified laws to curb union power. Ed Miliband told the Guardian that strikes should be a last resort. A backbencher has proposed a Bill banning strikes in the emergency and transport sectors and Boris Johnson, the beloved mayor of London, wants a ban on any strike that fails to secure the backing of 50% of those able to vote.

Unions and their supporters complain endlessly that there is no right to strike in the UK, only a regime of immunities. Various shifts in statute and case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll