header-logo header-logo

15 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Conveyancing , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Licensing fast-track for conveyancing & probate professionals

Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals

In December, the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) introduced the ‘Advanced Probate Exemption’, under which practitioners can skip parts of the CLC licence process if they already have certain Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) certificates. Practitioners with STEP certificates in will preparation and administration of estates or administration of trusts will only need to complete one further stage, the CLC’s professional obligations unit, to gain a CLC licence.

Claire Richardson, CLC director of authorisations, said the exemption ‘provides a clear route for experienced STEP professionals, giving them confidence in their professional and legal status.

‘By uniting the expertise of a leading probate body and specialist regulator, it delivers a single route to recognised practising rights. For employers, it offers a practical solution to the shortage of authorised practitioners, while for practitioners it supports straightforward career advancement in a critical area of demand’.

In November, the CLC launched the ‘professional experience’ route to allow fee earners with at least four years of experience in conveyancing or probate work to bypass the Level 4 Diploma and move straight to the Level 6 Diploma, which qualifies them as a licensed conveyancer or probate practitioner. To be eligible for this route, practitioners must be currently working in a law or accountancy firm in England or Wales, have four years’ continuous experience, be supervised by an authorised person, meet certain competency standards and provide a signed letter of support from their employer.

Richardson said: ‘Candidates will still undergo rigorous assessment, but more weight will be given to their practical experience. This will hopefully embolden more people, perhaps those who have taken time out and are daunted at the thought of returning to study, to realise their potential, underlining the CLC’s continued commitment to making qualifications as inclusive and accessible as possible while maintaining our usual high standards.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll