header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

NLJ this week: Rights & wrongs where employees monitored by wearable neurotech

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
30 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Employment , Discrimination , Human rights , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
220705
When advanced neurotechnology is used to monitor employees, what legal issues arise? In this week’s NLJ, Harry Lambert, Outer Temple Chambers, and Josh Neaman, Devereux Chambers, examine workplace rights at a new frontier, in the 8th part of a special NLJ series

Wearable brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) create challenges relating to unfair dismissal and discrimination. Workplace monitoring via BCIs could lead to discrimination, particularly once algorithmic biases affect data reliability.

Lambert, founder and head of the Centre for Neurotechnology and Law, and Neaman, give the example of ‘emotional monitoring of floor staff in a restaurant reveals which staff have the greater propensity to get angry with customers. This information then forms the basis for management decisions around that employee’. 
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Employment , Discrimination , Human rights , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Health & safety
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Read All
Conveyancers celebrate U-turn over mortgage handbook fee
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
Are you suited to a career in prosecution?
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
LSB marks Mazur homework
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
NLJ this week: Stuck in the past?
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
NLJ this week: No automatic bar on ‘user damages’
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll