header-logo header-logo

24 October 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-detail

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Reeves is considering imposing a charge on people who use LLPs, as part of a tax raid on lawyers, accountants, locum doctors, doctors in private practice and other professionals such as consultants, The Times and other outlets reported this week. Current speculation suggests it would be set at less than the 15% rate of national insurance, could raise about £2bn per year and would affect LLPs only, not partnerships as a whole.

An LLP partner’s liability is limited to their investment and they are treated as self-employed for tax purposes so do not pay the 15% rate for employer national insurance contributions.

However, nobody will know for certain whether Reeves is kite-flying to test the idea or serious until budget day on 26 November.

David McNeill, the Law Society’s director of public affairs, said the alleged plan ‘makes no logical sense as a joined-up growth strategy.

‘Imposing a new tax on LLPs could be a big hit on the legal profession, a sector which the government is depending on as part of its growth strategy. Law partnerships don’t get the same tax breaks for investment as other businesses but are now having to pay the same levels of tax. On top of that, law firms are facing the risk of new regulation costs and bureaucracy’.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll