header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Jonathan Herring

Professor in law

Jonathan Herring is a professor in law, Exeter College, Oxford University. (jon.herring@law.ox.ac.uk)

Professor in law

Jonathan Herring is a professor in law, Exeter College, Oxford University. (jon.herring@law.ox.ac.uk)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Allowing alleged abusers to cross examine their victims is a stain on the reputation of the family justice system. Jonathan Herring puts the case for reform

Jonathan Herring considers a tragic case concerning the right to withhold invasive medical treatment

How can the court protect a child’s welfare when faced with clashing world views, asks Jon Herring

Jonathan Herring comments on the “unfair” laws surrounding cohabitation

Jonathan Herring investigates what behaviour amounts to harassment

Jonathan Herring reveals a case that illustrates that cheats never prosper

AC v SC provides an important reminder of the weight to be attached to FDR agreements, says Jonathan Herring

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll