header-logo header-logo

Arresting developments

03 June 2016 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7701_herring

Jonathan Herring investigates what behaviour amounts to harassment

Normally when a court order is breached an individual will face sanctions for contempt of court. However, the position in relation to non-molestation orders made under the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) is a little different. Section 42A of FLA 1996 makes it a criminal offence to breach such an order. This provision was designed to enhance protection to victims of domestic violence by placing responsibility for enforcement in the hands of the police, rather than depending on the victim bring proceedings herself. In particular it was designed to address the concern that a victim of domestic abuse might be threatened by the abuser into not to bringing contempt proceedings.

The facts of O’Neill

In R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92, [2016] All ER (D) 216 (Mar) the Court of Appeal had to determine what kinds of breach of a non-molestation order might constitute an offence. Section 42A itself states that any breach of the order amounts to an offence. However, following this decision it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll