header-logo header-logo

charles_pigott

Charles Pigott

Professional support lawyer

Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve LLP. (charles.pigott@mills-reeve.comwww.mills-reeve.com)
 

Professional support lawyer

Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve LLP. (charles.pigott@mills-reeve.comwww.mills-reeve.com)
 

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Charles Pigott explores reasonable adjustments, trial periods & alternative employment
Charles Pigott on how the courts are applying the For Women Scotland ruling
As the Bill nears the end of its journey in the Lords, Charles Pigott predicts its future
Whistleblowing protection is inching forward with judicial help, writes Charles Pigott—but reform is still needed
Could a recent ruling plug the gap in remedies for trade union detriment claims? Charles Pigott considers the scope of the Blacklisting Regulations
Charles Pigott outlines key employment measures contained within the government’s Employment Rights Bill
The ruling in the group action against the retailer paves the way for more claimants in the retail sector & beyond, writes Charles Pigott
How is Labour planning to make work pay? Charles Pigott examines the planned changes to employment policy under the new government
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll