header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7815

02 November 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

Shred, store, or secure? Matthew Kay & Natasha Adom tackle the archiving conundrum

Carry on testing; lawyer bypass regrets; better reception likely.

Accountable Care Organisations: a new model for the provision of health & social care? Nicholas Dobson reports

Does ENRC represent a missed opportunity for legal professional privilege, asks Tom Dane

It’s time for schools to reflect on the discriminatory nature of excluding children with special educational needs, says Olivia Wybraniec

Michel Reznik reports on recommendations by the Treasury Committee for the creation of a Financial Services Tribunal

In Justice Week, David Greene shows how the crisis in crime is reflected to particular areas of practice in civil justice

​A series of recent decisions provide important guidance for litigators over securing fees when a client goes bust, says Grania Langdon-Down

Ongoing uncertainty around Brexit perceived as a negative factor

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll