header-logo header-logo

Fighting exclusion

01 November 2018 / Olivia Wybraniec
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
nlj_7815_wybraniec

It’s time for schools to reflect on the discriminatory nature of excluding children with special educational needs, says Olivia Wybraniec

  • The appellants had been preventing from bringing a claim for disability discrimination against their autistic son’s school after he was excluded for aggressive behaviour.
  • The Upper Tribunal was asked to review the exception to protection from discrimination where there was a tendency to physical violence, on Convention grounds.
  • The Upper Tribunal upheld the appeal, finding the Regulations failed to balance the rights of children with special educational needs and violated their Convention right to education without discrimination.

It is a difficult reality that some children with special educational needs face school exclusions due to behaviour which is a manifestation of those very needs. Even more problematic is that those children may previously have been prevented from bringing disability discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) because of an exclusion from the EqA 2010 for cases involving physical violence. The appellant parents in C & C v The Governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll