header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7569

19 July 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Minister Finansow v RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland sp. z o.o. C-155/12 [2013] All ER (D) 115 (Jul)

R (on the application of AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49, [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Jul)

Jon Robins turns the spotlight on the conclusions & recommendations of the long awaited LETR

Robert Brown examines the implications for eDisclosure when a company’s data has moved into cyberspace

Alec Samuels navigates a potential solution for judicial mishaps

Lawyer claims that ministers’ motor law flaws are “unconstitutional”

PI lawyer calls into question insurance company’s appeal for MRI scans to diagnose whiplash

Traumatised employee loses claim for damages

Legal education foundation awards its first six grants

 Direct Line Group & Parabis Law apply to set up ABS

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll