header-logo header-logo

30 January 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

Conveyancers celebrate U-turn over mortgage handbook fee

Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook

UK Finance was proposing to charge conveyancers a £50 annual fee per user to access the Handbook platform when it launches next month, adding extra cost onto each transaction. Following complaints from CILEX, the Law Society and others this week, however, it reversed course on Friday afternoon—dropping the Handbook fee for conveyancers.

CILEX CEO Jennifer Coupland said: ‘Our members will be relieved at the swift decision by UK Finance and we’re grateful to them for listening.

‘We now look forward to working with them as the new handbook is implemented.’

As Coupland explained earlier this week, using the Handbook is mandatory when acting for lenders therefore conveyancers would have faced ‘a stark choice’ of absorbing the cost or passing it on to clients. Coupland said passing the fee onto the client would not have been ‘without risk. If handled incorrectly, it could raise regulatory questions around how client money is held and accounted for, including anti-money laundering considerations’.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘We are delighted that UK Finance has listened to the concerns of the Law Society and other UK law societies.

‘We commend UK Finance for reacting swiftly to the strength of opposition against 
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll