header-logo header-logo

Ladbrokes not liable for armed raid trauma

17 July 2013
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Traumatised employee loses claim for damages

An employee traumatised by an armed raid on the betting shop where she worked has lost her claim for damages for psychological injury.

The Court of Appeal dismissed Kerry Nicholls appeal, in Nicholls v Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming [2013] EWCA Civ 1963.

She claimed damages on the basis that Ladbrokes had failed to provide a safe working environment as they should have instructed that the magnetic locking system on the door be used after dark as well as at opening and closing times.

The High Court found Ladbrokes had breached its duty, and awarded £9,000 in damages.

However, two of the three Lords Justice of Appeal held there was no breach because the shop was not in a high-risk area, the security procedures did not fall short of those standard in the industry and a magnetic lock was not perceived in the industry as a vetting device.

Lord Justice Tomlinson said: “In my view it cannot ordinarily be negligent to fail to ensure that a safety or security device is used if it would not have been negligent not to have installed the device in the first place.”

Issue: 7569 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll