header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011 / Stephan Balthasar
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Features , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The wrong vehicle?

Is the common European sales law a Trojan horse, asks Stephan Balthasar

The European Commission has been pursuing efforts to harmonise European contract law for over a decade now. More recently, the project has been gaining speed: in 2010, the Commission published a green paper on policy options for “progress towards a European contract law for consumers and businesses” (COM(2010)348). Following the consultation process, the Commission nominated an expert group to work out a feasibility study, which was published on 3 May 2011. On 11 October, Viviane Reding, Vice-president and Commissioner responsible for justice, fundamental rights and citizenship, presented a proposal for a regulation “on a Common European Sales Law” (COM(2011)635), which she intends to put on the statute book by 2012.

The Commission’s draft regulation provides for an “optional instrument”, the so-called “28th regime”—a contract law that parties to cross-border sales contracts may choose as an alternative to national laws (Art 3 of the draft regulation). The common European sales law is designed to be applied in both B2B and B2C relationships. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll