header-logo header-logo

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Whiplash settlements at slow pace

Personal injury lawyers have highlighted problems with the Official Injury Claims (OIC) portal, including a rise in the average settlement time.

The OIC, which launched alongside wider whiplash reforms in May 2021, is used for road traffic accident injury claims worth less than £5,000. 

According to quarterly data (up to December 2022) published by the OIC last week, the volume of cases is rising, with 22,630 claims during the quarter compared to a total of 76,873 since it launched.

However, the figures also show a steady rise in the average settlement time from 45.2 days in the OIC’s first quarter after launch to, in subsequent quarters, 85 days, 139 days, 175 days, 208 days and, in the most recent quarter, 227 days.

The OIC report states: ‘This is to be expected as we are now seeing cases settle with more complex injuries and longer prognoses. It is likely to continue to rise.’

The Justice Committee began an inquiry last month into the impact of the 2021 whiplash reforms and how well the OIC is working. Submitting evidence this week, CILEX warned the rise in settlement times with cases taking three-quarters of a year to resolve is ‘being seen as a norm’.

CILEX questioned the accessibility of the portal for unrepresented lay claimants, who are often unable to ‘effectively collate’ the evidence, particularly since claims may be complex and intricate. Moreover, 88% of OIC claimants are legally represented but there is no costs recovery; therefore clients must pay lawyers out of their damages, which makes the work less financially viable, resulting in small and medium-sized firms dropping out of the whiplash claims market.

CILEX president Matthew Huggett said: ‘We would like to see better legal education, advice and guidance for those using the portal and ongoing monitoring to ensure that consumer choice is not being compromised.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll