header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail

Whiplash claims revisited

MPs have begun an inquiry into whether whiplash claims are being processed effectively following a series of reforms.

Personal injury lawyers campaigned against the reforms when they were announced in 2021, fearing claimants might be under-compensated and lose access to justice.

The reforms included fixed tariffs, a ban on claims without medical evidence, raising the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, and the online claims portal or Official Injury Claim Service. The aim was to halve the more than £2bn annual claims for whiplash, which insurers said added £90 to car insurance policies. Savings of between £40 and £50 per year were then to be passed on to motorists.

Sir Bob Neill, chair of the Justice Committee, said: ‘We want justice to prevail, but we want it to be efficient as well.’

The committee will ask why 90% of claimants continue to use lawyers when using the online portal, whether the portal is accessible, and whether it ensures access to justice. It will look at the effect the reforms have had on the number of minor personal injury claims to date, to what extent any savings are being passed on to motorists, and whether claims are being settled in a timely manner.

Andrew Wild, head of legal at First4InjuryClaims, said: ‘Road traffic accident claims have almost halved since 2018 but the promised savings for motorists have yet to materialise—insurance premiums have actually gone up.

‘The portal has been so poorly marketed and plagued with issues that motorists could be forgiven for giving up, particularly when the average settlement time currently stands at more than seven months.

‘An inquiry into the reforms has to be welcomed but, almost two years in, I hope this is not simply a box ticking exercise.’

Submit evidence to the inquiry by 5pm on 17 March.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll