header-logo header-logo

01 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Surrogacy mothers can have maternity leave

Advocate-General splits maternity leave between commissioning & surrogate mothers

A woman who has a child with a surrogate mother is entitled to maternity leave, according to a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The woman (Ms CD) did not provide ovum but her partner provided the sperm. By law, the woman who gave birth was regarded as the mother. However, they were granted a parental order under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 nearly four months later. While maternity leave and adoption leave are paid, women who have children through a surrogate are entitled only to unpaid leave in certain conditions, under national law.

The woman’s employer, an NHS Foundation hospital, initially refused her request for time off “for surrogacy”, but later reconsidered and granted paid adoption leave. However, the woman claimed unfair dismissal and the case was referred to the Court of Justice to determine whether in accordance with EU law a woman has the right to receive paid maternity leave when a surrogate mother has given birth to a child. Delivering her opinion in the case, Attorney-General Kokott said both mothers should be given at least two weeks’ leave, but there should be no “doubling” of leave. She ruled out the possibility of unfavourable treatment of the intended mother relating to pregnancy because she was not pregnant, and found no evidence of direct or indirect discrimination. Therefore, the remaining 10 weeks of leave should be divided between them.

Rita D’Alton-Harrison, a qualified solicitor and senior lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire, says that, although preliminary rulings do not bind national courts, it is likely that the employment tribunal which referred the case would find in Ms CD’s favour. 

“This is an important step towards the recognition of legal motherhood for commissioning mothers, and it is hoped that it will herald the much delayed separate legislation on surrogacy, which was called for by the Brazier Committee as far  back as 1998 and the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee in 2005,” she adds. 

Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll