header-logo header-logo

Promotions at Birkett Long

12 July 2012
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Five staff receive promotions

Birkett Long has announced the promotions of Wendy Kelly, Helen Pettican, Emma Waters and Emma Wraight, who become associates, and of Claire Read, who becomes equity partner. Wendy has been the chief cashier of the firm for more than 20 years. Helen started as a secretary before working her way up to quality manager in her 25 years at the firm. Emma Waters is a member of the personal tax, trusts and probate team. Emma Wraight specialises in commercial and residential property law and Claire is head of personal tax, trusts and probate in Chelmsford.

Issue: 7522 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll