Issue:
7995
/
Categories:
Features
,
Profession
,
Criminal
,
Regulatory
,
Disciplinary&grievance procedures
Veronica Cowan reports on a case which is creating uncertainty in police serious misconduct cases
- Reports on impact of Eckland v Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset.
- Asks if Legally Qualified Chairs, who hear serious misconduct cases in the police, should have immunity from suit.
As of late I have taken to reading Lynda La Plante crime novels, and if real police officers indulge in some of the antics her fictional ones do, we really should be worried.
But they will, at least, be held to account, and in the UK that is done by Legally Qualified Chairs and Independent Panel Members (LQCs and IPMs), who are appointed by Police and Crime Commissioners, to serve on police misconduct hearing panels. When police authorities chaired these panels, the process was perceived as the police judging the police. This is an important constitutional step, and the stakes are high, because a police officer accused of gross misconduct is at risk of dismissal. To sit on a panel, individuals must satisfy the judicial-appointment
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=b21f1aaf_1)
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=754d0e82_1)
