header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Worrying developments on judicial review ousters

04 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
132786
The government succeeded in blocking a potential judicial review, in a recent case on ouster clauses (Oceana). How concerned should we be about this development?

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Nick Wrightson, partner at Kingsley Napley, notes that the decision itself is narrow enough so as not to ‘significantly imperil the rule of law’. Looking ahead, however, he warns there may be trouble to come.

He writes: ‘The real concern… is that Oceana is proof of concept for a particular form of ouster clause, and the government is already identifying other opportunities to exclude judicial review using this “template”': for example, the Illegal Migration Act 2023, which contains ouster clauses very similar to the one considered in Oceana.

Read more from Wrightson on ouster clauses here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll