header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Integrity a non-starter in election betting row

05 July 2024
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Governance
printer mail-detail
180625

Several Conservatives came a cropper when they placed their bets on the date of the 2024 general election

Writing in this week’s NLJ, John Gould, senior partner at Russell-Cooke, warns: ‘If the allegations are true they feed the perception that the standards of integrity in parts of our public systems are even lower than people imagine.’  

While lots of people like a punt, nobody likes a cheat and, rightly or wrongly, a perception has arisen that some people close to 10 Downing Street have been heading down the bookies when their first thought should be the good of the country. Integrity matters. Gould offers his take on the election betting scandal.

Issue: 8078 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Governance
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll