header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Fairness from day one

28 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
237021
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims

Every employee will enjoy protection from their first day. The reform keeps the ‘range of reasonable responses’ test but vastly expands who can bring claims, moving litigation focus from eligibility to fairness.

Probationary dismissals and short-term contracts must now meet full procedural standards under Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd. Employers must document reviews, feedback and reasons; tribunals will scrutinise even early exits. Large HR teams may adapt easily, but SMEs face steep learning curves.

Hargreaves and Johnston predict rising claims, tighter documentation culture and a decisive shift toward evidence-based management—making fairness not a privilege of tenure, but a universal obligation.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll