header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Bigamy & intestacy

24 October 2025
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
233189
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law

The court ruled that Margaret Dinsdale, whose 2017 Las Vegas marriage was void because her husband never divorced his first wife, could still be treated as a ‘spouse’ under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. Master Brightwell’s pragmatic ruling granted her £50,000 interim maintenance and recognised her good-faith marriage and financial dependence.

Rajput warns that the case highlights the costly fallout of informal separations and outdated wills. Her takeaway: always finalise divorces, update testamentary documents and document dependency. In an age of blended families, she concludes, romantic intentions are no substitute for formal legal steps.

Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll