header-logo header-logo

McCloud fallout challenge fails in High Court

15 March 2023
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Public
printer mail-detail
A bid by trade unions to challenge the Treasury’s decision to use a cost control mechanism contained in the Public Service Pensions Act 2013 (PSPA 2013) has failed in the High Court.

The Treasury used the mechanism to modify members’ benefits due to the cost of implementing ‘the McCloud remedy’, which addressed age discrimination in pensions (following Lord Chancellor v McCloud & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2844). The unions claimed this decision misconstrued PSPA 2013, breached legitimate expectation, indirectly discriminated against younger members and was therefore unlawful.

Dismissing the claim in Fire Brigades Union & Ors v HM Treasury [2023] EWHC 527 (Admin), however, Mr Justice Choudhury held the wording of PSPA 2013 was sufficiently wide and the purpose of the cost control mechanism was to control a cost such as McCloud. Moreover, while some members were disadvantaged, the dividing line was not their age but the nature of the McCloud remedy itself.

Issue: 8017 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll