header-logo header-logo

16 September 2010 / Azmina Gulamhusein
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The last great taboo

Azmina Gulamhusein examines employers’ attitudes to mental illness

It is estimated that one in four persons will experience a mental health problem at some point in their lives and the economic crisis has led to a significant increase in work-related stress, depression and anxiety. For example, the charity LawCare (which provides a pastoral care service for lawyers) reported that 2009 was its busiest year ever and there was a 10% rise in the number of callers to its helpline complaining of stress.

Although mental ill-health is widespread and a major cause of sickness absence, it remains a taboo subject in the workplace. Recent case law has highlighted the stigma that is still associated with mental illness and the difficulties in meeting the statutory definition of a disabled person. However, it is hoped that provisions in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) due to take effect next month will provide better protection for vulnerable employees with mental health conditions.

The facts in J v DLA Piper UK LLP

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT’s) recent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll