header-logo header-logo

LASPO failing children

08 February 2018
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Research reveals thousands of young people ‘at grave risk’

Legal aid cuts in 2013 have had devastating consequences for children, a new report by Coram Children’s Legal Centre (Coram) reveals.

The report, Rights without remedies, which was published this week, shows the impact on children of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012). It highlights how the cuts introduced by LASPO left thousands of children each year at grave risk of miscarriages of justice with some losing their home, legal status, education and family access.

According to the report, at least 6,000 children each year are unable to access legal help or representation on a civil matter. For example, Coram’s Child Law Advice Service (CLAS) believes schools may have acted unlawfully in a quarter of school exclusions by not complying with procedures or not adequately considering special educational needs. However, legal aid was not available in most of these cases.

Coram also estimates that there are several thousand children in local authority care where immigration (rather than trafficking or asylum) is the main issue. Those children would be claimants in their own right but are not eligible for legal aid. While local authorities have a duty to help those children resolve their immigration and legal issues, the relevant statutory guidance is silent on how it is to be funded. Coram estimate it costs local authorities £10m per year, compared to a cost of £6m or less if legal aid were restored.

Consequently, Coram is calling for urgent changes to the government’s exceptional funding ‘safety net’ for vulnerable individuals, and for legal aid to be reinstated for all children in the care of local authorities or where children’s services are involved in private law family proceedings.

Dr Carol Homden, Coram’s chief executive officer, said: ‘Charities cannot, nor can they be expected to, fill the gaps left by limitations to a statutory service.’ 

Issue: 7780 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll