header-logo header-logo

26 July 2023
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Cyber , Technology
printer mail-detail

Indemnity insurers in low-risk mindset but firms taking a chance on cyber attacks

Seven in ten (72%) firms have not purchased cyber insurance amid a hardening professional indemnity cover market overall, research has shown.

While 28% of firms bought cybercrime cover—an increase on the 21% who made the purchase in 2018—a further 33% of firms thought about it but didn’t go ahead, and 39% didn’t even consider it, according to the Law Society report, 'Latest trends in professional indemnity insurance for law firms', published last week.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja described the low take-up as ‘concerning’, given how more work is being conducted online post-pandemic.

Solicitors Regulation Authority minimum terms and conditions for professional indemnity insurance explicitly exclude from cover first-party losses from cyber attacks or other problems related to information technology. The Law Society has produced guidance on purchasing cyber insurance, available here.

A government report published in April, 'Cyber security breaches survey 2023', showed one in ten businesses had fallen victim to cybercrime in the previous 12 months. Larger businesses experienced higher risk—the strike rate was one quarter of medium-sized businesses, and nearly two-fifths of large businesses.

The professional indemnity insurance market for solicitors has hardened since 2018, when the Law Society last carried out a survey, with 56% (compared to 76% in 2018) reporting it was easy to purchase insurance.

Shuja said: ‘We advise firms to start budgeting for increased premiums and perhaps consider premium financing as a way to spread costs through the year.

‘We also recommend firms start the renewal process early; around three months before your renewal date. That means that if you are one of the more than 40% of firms who still have the old common renewal date of 1 October, you should have contacted your broker already to start exploring the right cover for your firm.’

She said some firms could face much higher premiums, particularly where they had high staff turnover, large numbers of fee earners or carried out high amounts of conveyancing work. New firms and firms switching insurers have faced difficulties with some underwriters imposing minimum prices for premiums, she said. However, for firms working in low-risk areas, the premium increase was likely to be in the low single figures.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll