header-logo header-logo

15 March 2023
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Employment
printer mail-detail

Hunt’s ‘back to work’ Budget

A corporation tax hike from 19% to 25% for businesses making profits of more than £250,000, and changes to pensions, childcare and disability benefits were some of the headline figures of the Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt’s Budget

Hunt’s ‘back to work’ budget promised up to 30 hours per week of childcare for every child from the age of nine months (currently only three and four-year-olds get nursery hours). He abolished the lifetime allowance for pensions and raised the annual allowance from £40,000 to £60,000.

He plans to abolish the work capability assessment, separate benefits entitlement from an individual’s ability to work and set up a universal support scheme to help disabled people into work.

Hunt announced some tax relief measures—full capital expensing for at least the next three years so business investment in IT, plant or machinery is fully tax deductable straight away. He announced a two-year extension to the Climate Change Agreement to give eligible businesses £60m of tax relief for energy efficiency measures.

However, there was no increase in the budget for the justice system.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘The Chancellor can find £63m to invest in swimming pools but not our crumbling justice system.

‘It would only take £30m to bridge the gap between current government proposals and independent recommendations to increase solicitor’s criminal legal aid fees by 15%. Backlogs in every court means that for tens of thousands of people justice is delayed. Our courts are falling apart and there is a dire shortage of judges and court staff.

‘Departmental spending continues to rise lower than the level of inflation, further squeezing the Ministry of Justice’s already limited resources and increasing pressure on our justice system.’

Issue: 8017 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll