header-logo header-logo

Halal food

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

UK Halal certification bodies are not accountable or supervised by any public body, and therefore consumers have little to go on beyond trusting the producers, says barrister John Pointing, of Statutory Nuisance Solutions. Writing in NLJ this week, he calls for more regulation. “An important EU-wide initiative, which involves the British Standards Institute, is currently under way to introduce common standards for the production, monitoring and labelling of Halal foods. It is hoped that an authoritative and consistent body of rules can be agreed, particularly over the stunning issue.”

Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll