header-logo header-logo

29 May 2014 / John Pointing
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Consensus matters

web_pointingi

Shariah & state law are linked in food law in complex ways, as John Pointing explains

Food law is of primary concern to Muslims. The distinction between that which is permitted—Halal—and that which is Haram, or forbidden, is of fundamental importance. But there is no consensus on what is permitted. Islamic jurisprudence is interpretative, based on religious scholarship and on various schools of thought that allow important differences to subsist regarding juridical categories. Shariah law is preoccupied with this complex and contested field, because religious beliefs are engaged with dietary rules and with related issues such as the non-stunning of animals prior to slaughter.

 

The preparation for sale of Halal food must conform to state law and regulation. State law in the UK is not specifically concerned with Halal foods, so how does Halal fit with state law? Shariah, or Islamic, law is not isolated from state law and neither is it at odds with state law. Probably many people living in the UK today experience some degree of fear or suspicion, or even hostility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll