header-logo header-logo

The great escape

Gross misconduct is no barrier to pay in lieu of notice, notes Anna Macey

In Cavenagh v William Evans Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 697 Duncan Cavenagh was the managing director of William Evans Limited. Exercising a clause in Cavenagh’s contract, the company summarily terminated his employment, acknowledging their contractual obligation to pay Cavanagh six months’ pay in lieu of notice (PILON).

Before the £65,000 due was paid, the company became aware that two months before the termination, Cavenagh had authorised a transfer of £10,000 from company funds to his pension provider. The company refused to pay the PILON, and Cavenagh sued for the payment as a debt due under his contract.

Boston Deep Sea Fishing

Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, as the Court of Appeal acknowledged, is a leading authority for many of the principles governing dismissal for gross misconduct. It established that an employee may be dismissed summarily for gross misconduct, and critically that an employer can defend a claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll