header-logo header-logo

Good will hunting

23 September 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7715_fudakowska

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason analyse solicitors’ duties in estate matters

  • What is the scope of duty of care in estate planning?

To what extent can a professional who is not a solicitor be liable to disappointed beneficiaries of an estate in relation to planning carried out during the deceased’s lifetime? This is the question addressed in Herring and Hartley v Shorts Financial Services LLP [2016] WTLR 1203—it is not quite as simple as it seems.

Duty of care

Prior to 1995 no duty of care was owed by a professional adviser to persons who were not his or her client. White v Jones [1995] 2 AC 207, [1995] 1 All ER 691 marked a radical departure, establishing a duty of care to the beneficiary of a will for negligence in the preparation of a will.

The White v Jones principle has been extended outside the will-making process to estate planning incrementally. While the court in White v Jones stated that the intended beneficiary of a lifetime gift would not be owed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll