header-logo header-logo

Gone but not forgotten

Do employers owe a duty of care to ex-employees, ask Michael Salter
& Chris Bryden

Implied into every contract of employment is a mutual duty of trust and confidence between the employer and the employee. One aspect of this duty is that where an employer agrees to provide a reference for their employee such reference will be fair and reasonable. A breach of the duty of mutual trust and confidence will entitle that employee to resign and claim constructive dismissal.

Obligations to ex-employees

The ending of an employment relationship does not necessarily mean that the ex-employer’s obligations to their ex-employee have ended. For instance an ex-employer is likewise not obliged to give a reference for an ex-employee. However in many situations, one will be provided. There are risks however in so doing, even after the ending of the employment relationship. Readers will be familiar with the House of Lords’ decision in Spring v Guardian Assurance plc    [1994] 3 All ER 129, [1994] ICR

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll