header-logo header-logo

24 November 2021
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Freezing courts & overstretched judges

A shortage of lawyers and judges, and the poor condition of cold, leaky court buildings, are holding back efforts to reduce the backlog, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett has warned

Giving evidence to the Justice Select Committee last week, Lord Burnett said more Crown Court judges were needed, for example, a recent circuit court judge competition had fallen short by 12, and the 12 it fell short by were all criminal Crown Court judges rather than family and civil judges.

He said there are now about 366 court rooms capable of conducting jury trials, compared to about 300 a year ago, so physical capacity was no longer a constraining factor. However, he was ‘struggling in some parts of the country’ to provide the judicial resources necessary to do the work.

‘We are encouraging the recorders to sit more and the recorders are stepping up to that challenge, but again, the position is different in different parts of the country,’ he said.

‘London presents a particular problem. The Midlands the next problem. Other parts of the country less so. I am also encouraging recently retired circuit judges to sit in the crown court and we are deploying high court judges more than we did before COVID to sit in the crown court.’

Lord Burnett said he was ‘fairly confident’ the poor condition of court buildings, with broken heating systems and leaking roofs, was ‘one of the inhibitors to attracting people to become judges. I know that to be so because that is what people say.’ He agreed the poor maintenance of buildings was ‘a material risk in reducing the backlog’.

He also highlighted a shortage of criminal lawyers, stating ‘the likely reason is the relentless reduction in real rates of remuneration over the last 15 years’.

Lord Burnett reiterated these points at his annual press conference this week, repeating his calls for more judicial recruitment and funding to increase sitting days.

Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll