header-logo header-logo

Fire & rehire: lessons from P&O

22 March 2024 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
164876
Final fire & rehire code treads carefully through a legal & policy minefield, says Charles Pigott
  • The final draft of the statutory code of practice on dismissal and re-engagement was published in February 2024 and is due to take effect in the summer.
  • The government believes the new code will help ‘tackle fire and rehire practices by balancing protections for workers with business flexibility’.

A final draft of the new statutory code on dismissal and re-engagement (fire and rehire) has now been laid before Parliament. Subject to its approval by a resolution of both Houses of Parliament, the government plans to bring it into effect over the summer.

The publication of the final version of the code follows last year’s consultation over an earlier draft. That in turn was prompted by the P&O scandal in 2022, when nearly 800 seafarers were dismissed without any consultation, though they were not offered re-engagement on new terms in that case.

Purpose & scope of code

When an employer is proposing adverse

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll