header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 19 April 2024

19 April 2024 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8067 / Categories: Features , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
168689
April is surely the cruellest month for employment lawyers, contends Ian Smith as he wades through a deluge of statutory changes & a trio of cases
  • Sets out this month’s statutory changes, which include the coming into force of the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 and the Carer’s Leave Regulations 2024.
  • Discusses in detail three recent cases—two on whistleblowing, and one on applying unfair dismissal in the context of allegations of breakdown of trust and confidence.

When TS Eliot wrote that April is the cruellest month, it is possible that he was not thinking directly of employment lawyers trying to keep up to date with our subject. But he might well have done. This April has seen a continuation of the current avalanche of statutory changes. The first day of the month saw the increases of the national living wage (extended to all those over 21) and the national minimum wages, plus the revocation of the domestic worker exemption, which had caused problems of interpretation. However, that was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll