header-logo header-logo

Double jeopardy?

02 March 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

When is a marriage not a marriage, asks Jonathan Herring

It is increasingly common to marry overseas. In 2010 around 74,000 couples did. Rarely does that cause legal problems, but it can do as Galloway v Goldstein [2012] EWHC 60 (Fam) demonstrates.

Married on two continents

The husband was English and his wife American. Perhaps concerned about the rates of marriage breakdown, or perhaps just for the fun of it, they decided to get married twice: once in Connecticut, US, in April 1999 and then again one month later in England. There would have been no problem if the English ceremony had been in the nature of a blessing. But, it was not, it was a full marriage, registered at the General Register Office of England and Wales. By 2004, the marriage had broken down and was dissolved by the Superior Court of Connecticut. The US proceedings made no mention of the English ceremony, but made appropriate financial orders.

Some years later, the husband became concerned about the status of the English ceremony.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll